Leonardo Thinks — January 8, 2012 at 5:13 pm

Rómulo de Carvalho and António Gedeão, Scientist-Artist by M. Root-Bernstein

by

LEONARDO THINKS 1968 – 2012
Contemporary Opinion by Meredith Root-Bernstein

Meredith Root-Bernstein introduces the influential Portuguese teacher and historian of science Rómulo de Carvalho (1906-1997) who wrote under the pseudonym António Gedeão.
Rómulo de Carvalho and António Gedeão, Scientist-Artist

The influential teacher and historian of science Rómulo de Carvalho (1906-1997) is well known in his native Portugal both for his contributions to science education and for the poetry he wrote under the pseudonym António Gedeão. [1]  Although de Carvalho appears to have thought of his poetry and his scientific activities as entirely separate [2], he is considered the pre-eminent Portuguese example of a scientist-artist.  Both his prolific science writing and his poetry show a preference for simplicity, a lack of pretension, and a fascination with the workings of everyday life. [3]  In his poem “Colloidal suspension”, Gedeão negotiates a tension between formal, theoretical ways of knowing, and quotidian, empathetic understandings:

 

Colloidal suspension

I think about being a poet and being dispersed
through the voice of the voiceless.
I think about how little of me is in each verse,
how much of everything and of no one.

A blind man is playing La Violetera,
and seeing him I too go blind.
A wretched woman scrubs and waxes,
and seeing her, I too am a wretched scrubber.

What distant affliction and near joy,
what minimal, fragile, ephemeral nothingness,
does this combusting dredger hoist up from below,
ripping, digging and paving this subterranean street?

Postulates and laws, lemmata and theorems,
all that affirms, announces and admits,
theories, doctrines and systems,
all this eludes the author of these lines.
Both him and me.

trans. by C. Auretta [4]

Integrating theory and feeling may have seemed less problematic to de Carvalho than to Gedeão. In a high school physics workbook he writes that students must learn to “understand clearly the physical significance of the mathematical expression” and “know how to interpret, physically, the final result of the numerical operations.” [5] The answer to each problem is given directly below the question, emphasizing that the experience of understanding, not ‘getting it right’, should be the goal of education.
Acknowledgements

Many thanks to F.G. Carvalho for his permission to publish C. Auretta’s translation of “Colloidal suspension” and for biographic information on his father.
Endnotes

[1] Carvalho F.G, unpublished manuscript, a brief biography of Rómulo de Carvalho.

[2] de Carvalho R, Memórias,  (Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2011).

[3] e.g. de Carvalho R., História do telefone, (Coimbra: Atlântida, 1952); A física no dia-a-dia, (Lisbon: Relógio D’Água Editores,1995); Gedeão A., Obra Poética, (Lisbon: Edições João Sá da Costa, 2001).

[4] António Gedeão, Unpublished Manuscript, trans. by Auretta C. and Berry, M.; António Gedeão, Poems: A Bilingual Anthology.

[5]  de Carvalho R., Problemas de física para o 3° ciclo do ensino liceal, (Coimbra: Atlântida, 1959), p. 10.
Meredith Root-Bernstein is a PhD candidate at the Department of Ecology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Her email is mrootbernstein@bio.puc.cl.
ISSN No: 1071-4391
Author: Meredith Root-Bernstein, Guest Editorial, E-mail: mrootbernstein@gmail.com
Forthcoming: [Tentative date]: Leonardo Vol. 45:5 (Sept/Oct 2012)
Print: ISSN 0024-094X, Online: ISSN 1530-9282
Leonardo is a registered trademark of the ISAST.

Leave a Reply